I believe, education is a single of those points that are becoming taken and adopted with quite a few of the wrong ideas. A second strategy, also consistent with the dominant philosophy of character education, is an workout that could possibly be called If It really is Tuesday, This Need to Be Honesty.” Here, one value after one more is targeted, with each assigned its own day, week, or month. But it is entirely relevant that, in the shadows of their writings, there lurks the assumption that only religion can serve as the foundation for great character. In the case of the proponents of character education, I believe the answer to this riddle is quite distinctive.
Even putting aside the theological underpinnings of the character education movement, the five questions presented in this article can enable us describe the natural constituency of that movement. Wanting young persons to turn out that way doesn’t need us to adopt standard character education programs any additional than wanting them to be physically fit needs us to turn schools into Marine boot camps. Without having character education, our schools will just supply applications such as Values Clarification, in which adults are allegedly prohibited from taking a stand.
Appear at the way character education applications have been created and you will uncover, alongside such unobjectionable items as fairness” or honesty,” an emphasis on values that are, once more, distinctly conservative – and, to that extent, potentially controversial. Such either/or thinking, extended given that discarded by really serious moral philosophers,52 continues to fuel character education and to perpetuate the confusion of education with indoctrination.
Most relevant to character education is a series of research displaying that folks who have been rewarded for performing a thing good turn into less likely to think of themselves as caring or useful persons and far more likely to attribute their behavior to the reward. A modest, practically entirely African American school in Chicago makes use of a framework produced by the Character Education Institute.
Some of the most well-known schoolwide strategies for improving students’ character look dubious on their face. It will be challenging to explain that character education” is not synonymous with helping young children to develop into great people today and, indeed, that the movement linked with the term is a fantastic deal much more controversial than it very first appears. Character education rests on 3 ideological legs: behaviorism, conservatism, and religion.
Ironically, some people today who accept character education without the need of a second believed are rather articulate about the bankruptcy of this model when it comes to teaching academic subjects. Nonetheless, such programs are taken quite seriously by some of the similar persons who are speedy to dismiss other educational applications, such as those intended to promote self-esteem, as silly and ineffective. When President Clinton mentioned the importance of character education in his 1996 State of the Union address, the only precise practice he encouraged was requiring students to put on uniforms.